In our previous posting, "In Anwar or Reuters we trust?", one sceptical reader commented as below:
We trust ANwar. YOur propaganda made Anwar looks like superhero capable of doing so many thing. He is the agent of US, China, SIngapore or even Israel. Make him looks like a James Bond. Also you make Dr M like stupid fool or someone incapable of knowing what his subordinate action.There are three issues raised by this Anwar sympathiser or someone captivated by Anwar's oral capability.
First issue is about Anwar's involvement with the Ladah Datu intrusion. Mind us for the speculative piece in "Anwar's last straw" but his intention for an Arab Spring-like Malaysia Spring is unmistakeable and fairly conclusive. The various reports are there in our previous posting "In Anwar or Reuters we trust?".
Secondly, it about Anwar's international links and acting as agents for the superpower. Allow us to correct the commentator. It is just with the US, in which the condition has to be in tandem with US policy with Israel.
No for Singapore. Despite being an ally of the British and providing services to the US Navy fleet, Singapore can be diplomatically described as a concerned neighbour and observer. Definitely, Anwar is not linked to China.
Thirdly, it is his comments on Tun Dr Mahathir.
The reader is not at fault for being dumb strucked by Anwar. Probably too young to be aware of the history behind.
In our youth, we too were mesmerised by Anwar as student leader at University of Malaya in the early 70s. On several occasions, we heard him speak on campus and after he got out of ISA.
But we woke up fast enough from hallucination.
His rhetorics were getting repetitious. He only speak of what is ideally needed by society and nation as taken by some textbook or academic paper but not sufficiently knowledgeable or clever to know how to get there. By the late 70s, we saw his true colours at a Malaysian student gathering in the US.
That's it with him.
We met and socialised with Anwar's fellow student leader, Dato Ibrahim Ali when he was leading ITM's student union. His sister and brother-in-law to be was our history and geography teacher, respectively during our days in the lower forms.
On matters of Anwar, it is not merely a propaganda but from a lifelong profiling and understanding of the man. Many personalities had only been recently awaken.
None of Anwar's original comrades are still with him. Anwar is compromised and have deviated violently from his original struggle.
It is a struggle (perjuangan) worth fighting for to save the nation and future generation from the disaster to come by empowering this power crazy, orally talented but intellectually deficient man to the highest position in government.
To answer for the three issues, perhaps it is best to start with the third issue as the lowest hanging fruit.
As understudy to the Prime Minister, Anwar was a trusted man of Prime Minister Dr Mahathir. He was tasked with many political assignments. One of which being Sabah.
The suspicion on Anwar's immoral activities only surfaced in 1994, the year PBS was ousted. The then Inspector General of Police, Tun Hanif Omar approached the Prime Minister with the information on Anwar's homosexual activities.
When his problems finally begin unbearable with the abuse of power by Anwar to use the Special Branch of Police to suppress the report made by Ummi Hafilda, Azizan and the late Dr Rustina together with the expose by the late political Khalid Jefri in his book "50 Dalil: Kenapa Anwar tidak boleh jadi Perdana Menteri", Dr Mahathir had to step in.
Consequently, he was removed as Deputy Prime Minister in the midst of the financial crisis and the Commonwealth Games of 2000.
It was during the financial crisis that it was crystal clear that Anwar was acting in the best interest of his foreign power and was pursuing to bring Malaysia into the fold of IMF. That answers the second issue.
Back then, whatever initial sympathy we had for Anwar was over-rided by his self inflicting economic and financial policy on the country. Off course, more information, evidences and personal encounters convinced us to conclude that Anwar was a homosexual.
Perhaps, the commentator is too young or not following closely events and analysis from this side. There is voluminous and extensive work available. One highly recommended website to browse and understand all about Anwar is AIDC here.
Apart from Anwar's policy as Finance Minister during the financial crisis, he confirms his links with the US with the personal support he and his family gets from George Soros, Al Gore, Madeleine Albright, Jose Estrada, and Corazon Aquino.
Upon his release, Anwar taught at Georgetown Universities.
One must have some knowledge of American Universities to know what is the significance of univesities like Georgetown, Brandeis, Harvard, Chicago, etc and it's history and affiliations.
Subsequently, he revealed his association with State Department sponsored Foundation for the Futures, Institute of Foreign Relation, National Endowment on Democrasy, etc. See this fotopage here for sample of his list.
One must understand of Anwar's links with the Temple University in Philadelphia where most of his network within the government were schooled. Prof Ismail Faruqi taught there. One such person was Dato Dr Zambery Kadir, the current Perak Menteri Besar.
We understand because we frequented Philadephia where Dato Dr Awang Adek was doing his Economics doctorate at Wharton.
Anwar's contacts with the Middle East was via the CIA-linked and oil funded Wahabi organistion such as World Association of Muslim Youth (WAMY), International Islamic Institute of Thoughts (IIIT), etc. Read The "I" Files here.
His card with Israel was revealed when he openly criticised Israel in the attack on flotilla Rachel Corre and MV Marmara and he made an Apology Tour of the US to appease the Jewish power brokers. Off course, he was caught by his statement in the Wall Street Journal report on safeguarding the security of Israel.
Finally, the third issue.
Despite the undisclosed sources in the Malaysian and Phillipines military establishment as reported by media, how can one be convinced that Anwar met Nur Misuari and subsequently, Nur Misuari and the Sulu Sultanate had their men entered Lahad Datu easily with Anwar's help?
For s start, one should read Raja Petra's publication, Malaysia Today of Wikileak here of a May 2007 communication from the American Embassy in Manilla which reaffirm Nur Misuari's strong relationship with Anwar.
One should read this blog here and it's posting entitled "Sabah: A Prize Catch."
The blog described described several coincidence to proof their point that it is not so much about Sulu Sultanate ancestral claims. There is no legitimate Sulu Sultanate in the first place and there are 60 claimants to the throne making ot a hoax.
The blog talk of a US ship intentionally ran aground in the Phillipines as a smokescreen, a Phillipines Senator pretending to be a back channel but is actually a double agent, and irrelevant Sulu Sultante seeking American help to claim back Sabah, and a recent Manilla trip by Tian Chua and Sivarasa.
There is a character a terrorist cum conman by the name Manuello Amalilio who has close connection with the Sulu Sultanate.
It brings us to now not so covert operations trying to institute regime change in Malaysia. to conlcude, the blog claimed that "the The Sulu Sultanate claim is just a smokescreen."
There is no linked to the peace agreement with the MILF but only a deceptive power game for the lucrative price of Sabah oil.
Does it make sense why Anwar is campaigning for the impossible 20% oil royalty for Sabah? Read back our posting here because it could only be feasible with Petronas out of the picture and replaced by a foreign oil company.
This is the missing link that fits into the scheme of things in an article published by AIDC here on October 18, 2012. So it is about oil and Anwar is working to betray the country for American interest