tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post4910184954757862875..comments2024-02-22T02:33:21.869+08:00Comments on Another Brick in the Wall: Mahathir's wayang TamilA Voicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01780035743502972342noreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-20253363496752518752016-04-07T20:01:01.605+08:002016-04-07T20:01:01.605+08:00Selain Marcos, sejarah juga mengingatkan kembali k...Selain Marcos, sejarah juga mengingatkan kembali kezaliman seorang pemimpin negara dari Peru yang kesudahannya terpegok ke dalam penjara atas kesalahan menipu, menyeleweng public fund masuk ke akaun peribadi, menculik & pembunuhan kejam pada tahun 1990an. Siapa kata pemimpin negara kebal dari hukuman undang. Sudah ada precedence (contoh) kita boleh buat yg sama. Bekas Presiden Peru, Alberto Fujimori telah diekstradisikan ketika beliau melarikan diri ke Jepun dihadapkan ke mahkamah Peru mengikut International Laws.Othman Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15598528056121585834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-87472131987291292372016-04-07T19:42:23.281+08:002016-04-07T19:42:23.281+08:00In light of the treacherous act of Najib & Ros...In light of the treacherous act of Najib & Rosmah, who have humiliated themselves and the nation, where the world look upon us with scorn & shame, the rakyat trust will plummet. Henceforth, the rakyat of all backgrounds & political differences have joined hand in hand with one ultimatum to depose Najib as PM in order to quickly prevent further damage and save Malaysia from ruin. Only loco fellas will tend to believe that the TDM, Khairuddin & Anina's lawsuit against Najib & AG Pandir has no locus standi. locus standi my foot...!!<br /><br />A govt is made up of elected reps. The PM is like CEO of a co. If he is found cheating or corrupted, he is subjected to the laws & can be charged for CBT. If the PM is not Public Officer or Servant, why on earth is he being paid monthly salaries, extravagant perks, allowances, exclusive residence, luxurious cars with chauffeurs driven, countless bodyguards & escorts, luxurious well equipped jet, etc. Paid him from tax payers & public fund for what...is he a king or perhaps pahlawan bugis.....???? When he retires, why he continue to receive pension & perks if he is not govt servant? After all, even the king is no longer above the law. Hope Najib & Pak Pandir got this message.<br /><br /><br /><br />Othman Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15598528056121585834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-38252569983572215172016-04-07T18:57:48.140+08:002016-04-07T18:57:48.140+08:00Merujuk kpd isu duit derma & 1 mdb, kenapa Naj...Merujuk kpd isu duit derma & 1 mdb, kenapa Najib mesti berdolak dalik, bercakap bohong & berahsia sehingga orang no. 2 ketika itupun tidak tahu? Bank Negara hanya dimaklumkan pengaliran duit masuk tapi untuk tujuan apa dan cara mentadbirnya tidak dimaklumkan. Setelah berbelit-belit dan berbagai-bagai kenyataan dikeluarkan oleh Najib dan macai-macainya, nak cover pun dah tak ter'cover'. Heran, kalau boleh kutip RM2.6 Billion melalui derma buat apa menyusahkan rakyat dengan GST & memberhentikan sabsidi minyak? Tidakkah itu menzalimi/menindas rakyat semata-mata? <br /><br />Lagi satu, kenapa Najib & Rosmah menunjuk-nunjuk sikap boros & kemewahan seperti shopping sakan, belanja kahwin juta2 untuk anak mereka mengalahkan putri raja, menggunakan jet kerajaan untuk urusan peribadi. Lagi satu hal, macam mana pulak dalam akaun Rosmah ada juta2 sedangkan dia suri rumah sepenuhmasa yg mengharapkan gaji bulanan suami sebagai PM sebanyak RM23,000 sahaja. Anak Rosmah pulak mana dia cekau duit ratusan US$juta bikin filem hollywood dan mampu beli apartment2 mewah di Beverly Hills & New York....???? Ini yg melenyapkan keyakinan saya terhadap Najib.Othman Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15598528056121585834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-78319823706635223052016-03-25T09:20:43.008+08:002016-03-25T09:20:43.008+08:00Bukan saja rakyat sudah letih dan bosan dengan cer...Bukan saja rakyat sudah letih dan bosan dengan cerita basi yang dikitar semula lagi dan lagi tetapi akhirnya pihak yang mengujudkan cerita berkenaan semakin tidak bermaya.<br /><br />Dengan adanya saman ini bukan saja rakyat dapat "timeout" malah penyaman juga boleh 'berehat mandatori' yakni berhenti dari mendendangkan cerita yang sudah basi hinggalah di suatu masa. <br /><br />Fuh, lega.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-38895855975756677352016-03-25T06:33:12.219+08:002016-03-25T06:33:12.219+08:00AMir Zahni and Labu 8455
Wise up.
Everyone can ...AMir Zahni and Labu 8455<br /><br />Wise up. <br /><br />Everyone can give an opinion as long as we do not break any law. To say wait for court is not a progressive attitude.A Voicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01780035743502972342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-92133571071110058972016-03-24T23:00:17.298+08:002016-03-24T23:00:17.298+08:00I tot Najib always prqise democracy. So why is so...I tot Najib always prqise democracy. So why is so kecoh with TDM action sampai nak tulis berjela jela dlm blog. Just explain dalam court habis cerita. Bukan nya madey saman lu orang pun. Najib pun senyap jer.. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-75390567271450868602016-03-24T21:29:26.502+08:002016-03-24T21:29:26.502+08:00waw, ramai nya pakar undang undang yang berotak ud...waw, ramai nya pakar undang undang yang berotak udang. Kenapa perlu panic ? Apa kata beri peluang untuk mahkamah mendengar dan perbicaraan dijalankan dengan semua bukti bukti dan saksi saksi dapat diketengahkan untuk badan kehakiman membuat keputusan.Labu8455https://www.blogger.com/profile/18110263219081403750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-10115005744183008302016-03-24T18:09:03.428+08:002016-03-24T18:09:03.428+08:00Saman Mahathir sebenarnya tidak terpakai kerana ke...Saman Mahathir sebenarnya tidak terpakai kerana kerangka besar pada sisastan keatas PM ialah siasatan Audit . <br /><br />Tak kira samaada AGC, SPRM atau SB Polis sekali pun buat siasatan , selagi tiada syor dari Ketua Audit Negara berdasarkan siasatannya , maka pasukan lain tidak mempunyai akses pada siasatan tersebut . Perkara ini telah termaktub dibawah seksyen 8 Akta Audit 1957 .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-55367475573878242882016-03-24T13:33:41.380+08:002016-03-24T13:33:41.380+08:00hahaha ... even bersih lawyer say Mahathir cannot ...hahaha ... even bersih lawyer say Mahathir cannot win<br /><br />Lawyers pessimistic about Dr M's suit against Najib<br /><br />2751<br />Koh Jun Lin Published Today 7:54 am Updated Today 11:08 am 8 comments<br /><br />While former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad's lawsuit against his successor Najib Abdul Razak has caused a sensation, lawyers are pessimistic about the outcome of the suit.<br /><br />Lawyer New Sin Yew said the suit will ultimately fail because Najib is not considered a public officer under the law.<br /><br />For the rest of this story and more, subscribe for only RM150 a year. If you're already a subscriber, please Sign in.<br /><br />https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/335027<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-77106170327411067752016-03-24T12:33:39.072+08:002016-03-24T12:33:39.072+08:00Satu lagi rujukan ilmiah untuk student law bilaman...Satu lagi rujukan ilmiah untuk student law bilamana saman Tun M terhadap PM Najib berkaitan rasuah dan 2.6b akan meniti satu proses perundangan yg kompleks dan panjang. Saya melihat hal ini merupakan satu wayang utk burukkan institusi kehakiman, satu satunya sistem yg sangat mengagalkan niatnya Tun M untuk mengulingkan PM Najib. Tun M faham dan sedar kuasa peguam negara utk memula,menerus dan memberhentikan siasatan. Soal 1MDB dan 2.6b telah di putuskan oleh peguam negara tiada dakwaan di lakukan. Saman Tun M cuma manispetasi beliau untuk menyerang institusi perundangan negara dan melanggar perinsip rukun negara kepada perkara ke4 kedaulatan undang undang.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-58418845598638919552016-03-24T12:27:21.965+08:002016-03-24T12:27:21.965+08:00Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Will Mahathir now stop ...Wednesday, March 23, 2016<br /><br />Will Mahathir now stop talking since his case has gone to court? <br /><br /><br />Salleh Said Keruak<br /><br />Today, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and two others filed a suit against Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak for alleged ‘tort of misfeasance in public office’ and ‘tort of breach of fiduciaries in public office’, according to what their lawyer said.<br /><br />‘Misfeasance’ means an act that is legal but is performed improperly and describes a situation where an act by the defendant (in this case Najib), though legal, causes harm to the plaintiff (in this case Mahathir).<br /><br />A ‘fiduciary’, on the other hand, is a person who holds a legal or ethical relationship of trust with another party or parties. In such a relationship the fiduciary is required to act at all times for the sole benefit and in the interest of the one rendering that trust.<br /><br />In 1999, Anwar Ibrahim sued Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad for RM100 million. That same year he also sued The Sun for RM100 million as well. In 2008, Anwar sued Khairy Jamaluddin for RM100 million. In 2012, Anwar sued Nallakaruppan for RM100 million and in 2015 he sued NST and three others for RM70 million.<br /><br />These are but just a few of a long list of civil suits that eventually all went nowhere -- except for the Khalid Jafri Bakar Shah suit where Anwar was awarded only RM4.5 million nine years later and, even then, after the defendant had died. So, it is yet to be seen how long Mahathir’s suit is going to get locked up in court and what the outcome is going to be in the end.<br /><br />This is no doubt a very interesting case because now the onus is on Mahathir to prove guilt and no longer on Najib to prove his innocence. Mahathir will also have to convince the court that he has locus standi (which I am sure his lawyer would have looked into) and in what way he has suffered personal loss, injury or harm.<br /><br />The more important question is will Mahathir now have to stop talking since this case is now in court and if he continues to talk about the case what would happen? And what happens if the court rules against Mahathir? Would he accept that decision as final and lay this matter to rest? <br /><br />salleh said keruak at 10:54 PM<br /><br /><br />Can Mahathir prove Najib has infringed on rules in changing of officers? Najib is not new in government to not know he need to check with JPA.<br /><br />The one who changed Gani was Agong. JPA has power to change anyone. Discipline issue may need certain procedures. What does Mahathir has as proof?<br /><br />Believe he will do another publicity stunt when court reject the weak case.<br /><br />Snapshot2016https://www.blogger.com/profile/02253457753184395557noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-52781750604952669332016-03-24T11:00:31.703+08:002016-03-24T11:00:31.703+08:00"Jika Ds Najib kalah dan bayar gantirugi kpd ..."Jika Ds Najib kalah dan bayar gantirugi kpd Tun M, maka legally selesailah kes ini. Ds Najib tak perlu letak jawatan."<br />Salam Saudara Mohd Khairul Azam Bin Abdul Aziz.<br /><br />Setahu saya, Dr.M tidak menuntut ganti-rugi itu untuk diri beliau. Dia menuntut Najib membayar-balik RM2.6 Billion + RM42 Juta kepad Kerajaan atau Rakyat Malaysia.<br /><br /><br /><br />Mengenai andian Tuan punya blog;<br />"Tengku Razaleigh denied, thus indicating possible willingness to be played out again despite it is known Tun M is pushing for Dato Mukhriz as PM candidate against Najib."<br /><br />Muhkriz bukan pun Naib Presiden. Mana mungkin Mukhriz dilantik mengantikan Najib. Lain lah kalau Najib nak adakan PAU dengan segera, dalam masa terdekat. Jika Mukhriz dibenarkan bertanding melawan President. Itu pun, mustahil untuk Muhriz menang. Maklum sajalah....RD.https://www.blogger.com/profile/06318291442880190908noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-53154343776461441232016-03-24T10:41:13.452+08:002016-03-24T10:41:13.452+08:0010:20 AM
Typical mind and argument of a feudelist...10:20 AM<br /><br />Typical mind and argument of a feudelistic pentaksub. It is not based on facts or logical argument but purely subservient absolute trust to a person. Unfortunately the person is corrupt, compulsively lie in his politics and practise cronyism to the hilt. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-54447957289034398522016-03-24T10:20:36.365+08:002016-03-24T10:20:36.365+08:00Tun M kalau tak dak buti yg kukuh dia tak kan nak ...Tun M kalau tak dak buti yg kukuh dia tak kan nak initiate anything. Nagib Razak and his legal team can take this action as remeh at their own peril....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-74810238513109879962016-03-24T09:26:06.727+08:002016-03-24T09:26:06.727+08:00Tadi panjang lagi saya explain kat Astro Awani seb...Tadi panjang lagi saya explain kat Astro Awani sebenarnya tapi dia keluar sikit je.<br /><br />Ok saya ulas begini. Tort misfeasans adalah cabang undang2 tort yg berkaitan dgn tgjwb kakitangan awam terhadap pelanggannya. Jika kakitangan awam itu cuai dlm tugasnya sehingga menyebabkan kerugian sec direct kpd pelanggannya maka pelanggan itu boleh saman kakitangan krjn berkenaan atas faktor Tort misfeasans.<br /><br />Tanggungjawab fidusiari pula lebih luas maksudnya, tak hanya spesifik kpd kakitangan awam tetapi anak boleh menyaman bapa, adik boleh saman abang, anak khariah boleh saman imam jika superior mrk cuai dlm melaksanakan tgjwb. <br /><br />Maka Tun M saman DS Najib atas kedua2 isu ini atas kapasiti Najib sbg kakitangan awam dan kalaupun undang2 tak mengklasifikasikan Najib sbg kakitangan awam, Tun M ikat pula Najib di bawah tgjwb fidusiari.<br /><br />Kuat tak saman Tun M ni?<br /><br />2 perkara perlu dibuktikan Tun M kalau dia nak menang kes ini.<br /><br />i) Tun M kena ada bukti dokumen dan saksi mata yang sangat kuat yg boleh mengesahkan DS Najib telah cuai sbg PM dlm isu 1MDB dan RM2.6b<br /><br />DAN<br /><br />ii) Atas kecuaian tersebut Tun M menerima kesan langsung sbg individu. Cth: Biasanya Tun M terima elaun dari krjn RM1juta sebulan dan di sebabkan kecuaian Najib mengurus duit, elaun Tun M terpaksa di potong kpd RM400,000 sahaja sbb krjn tiada duit nak bayar elaun penuh sebanyak RM1 juta berkenaan. Di sebabkan itu Tun M telah kehilangan pendapatan, tekanan perasaan bla bla bla<br /><br />HANYA JIKA KEDUA2 PERKARA DI ATAS BERJAYA DI BUKTIKAN OLEH TUN M, BARULAH BELIAU BERPELUANG BESAR MENANG KES INI. JIKA TIDAK, BELIAU HANYALAH SEORG "BUSYBODY" MENURUT TAFSURAN UNDANG2 YG MENJADIKAN BELIAU TIADA LOCUS STANDI DAN TIADA KAUSA TINDAKAN UTK MENERUSKAN SAMAN INI DAN MAHKAMAH BOLEH MEMBATALKAN SAMAN INI DI PERINGKAT AWAL TANPA MENDENGAR MERIT KES ATAS ALASAN REMEH, MEMBUANG MASA MAHKAMAH DAN MENYALAHI UNDANG2. <br /><br />JIKA DI BENARKAN SAMAN TUN M INI, MAHKAMAH AKAN MEMBUKA FLOODGATE UTK SETIAP PEMBAYAR CUKAI DI MALAYSIA MEMFAILKAN SAMAN YG SAMA DAN INI PASTINYA AKAN MENYEBABKAN MAHKAMAH TIADA MASA MEMBICARAKAN KES LAIN MELAINKAN KES INI SAHAJA.<br /><br />Ok kalau Tun M berjaya buktikan kedua2 perkara di atas dan dia menang, adakah DS Najib kena letak jawatan?<br /><br />LEGALLY, DS Najib tak perlu letak jawatan krn ini kes sivil bukan kes jenayah. Dlm kes ini Tun M memohon gantirugi. Jika Ds Najib kalah dan bayar gantirugi kpd Tun M, maka legally selesailah kes ini. Ds Najib tak perlu letak jawatan.<br /><br />Tetapi MORALLY, DS Najib perlu letak jawatan sbb mahkamah dah mengesahkan kecuaian beliau.<br /><br />Tuan/puan, pandangan saya di atas tak bermaksud saya sokong DS Najib. Saya cuma berkongsi setitis pengalaman saya sbg Peguam tentang bagaimana mahkamah Malaysia menghadapi kes2 yg sebegini. Walaupun mungkin ada asas terhadap tindakan Tun M berkenaan, namun beban pembuktian dan kaitan dgn kerugian itu amat sukar di buktikan.<br /><br />Tetapi Tun M bebas mencuba utk meneruskan saman tetapi ada kemungkinan saman itu terpaksa di tolak oleh Mahkamah utk mendengar meritnya atas alasan pihak Plaintif tiada locus standi dan tiada kausa tindakan. <br /><br />Sekian.<br /><br />Mohd Khairul Azam Bin Abdul Aziz<br />Peguam<br />012-9770412<br /><br />Feel free to share.Just sharingnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-17366640838953328032016-03-24T09:09:16.245+08:002016-03-24T09:09:16.245+08:00Saman Tun M ni sekadar utk memastikan momentum pen...Saman Tun M ni sekadar utk memastikan momentum penentangan terhadap najib berkekalan.<br /><br />Hanya permainan perang saraf. Substance takde.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-44215916835104287492016-03-24T08:41:15.530+08:002016-03-24T08:41:15.530+08:00It is a truism that there is a racist streak in ev...It is a truism that there is a racist streak in everyone of us.ayahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11194581853629351048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19741162.post-82661925148805850422016-03-24T08:34:45.873+08:002016-03-24T08:34:45.873+08:00Let the court decidelah....since all of us are ind...Let the court decidelah....since all of us are indecisive "whether with me or against me".Anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04726594248941530472noreply@blogger.com