Another interpretation of Sanusi's explanation raised suspicion of corruption and abuse of power similar to the case against Muhyiddin involving Bokhary Equities donation to PPBM, as below:
Adding to the confusion is the bit about Tulangi requesting the return of RM1.3 million instead of the whole RM5 million.
Some details would be nice because apparently a reliable source said there was no flow of money into KFA account to show the donated money went to KFA. This contradict Sanusi's claim the money is all in the account.
Sanusi mentioned in his press statement about the RM5 million received was to pay debt. So which is which:
Money in the KFA account used to pay debt or KFA could only afford to repay RM1.3 million because money never went into the account?
In addition, it is a puzzle why Tan Sri Dr Mohd Daud Bakar, an Islamic finance expert would indulge in the messy privatisation and running of a state football club which is unlikely to make money?
He hails from Alor Setar and was the patron of Kedah Darul Aman FC from November 2021.
The full privatisation should be completed before the end of 2023. Then come late October press conference about the players unpaid salary. and his willingness to relinquish his shares in KDA FC.
Read on in Thick as a Brick here
No comments:
Post a Comment