Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Condemn, YES but NOT Charlie!


In his Twitter, UMNO Youth Chief, Khairy Jamaluddin commented: “I condemn again the Charlie Hebdo murders but the unity march was nauseating.“

It would have been the most politically incorrect word to say in response to the bloody incident. Knowing the tendency of Khairy's position on many issues, it came as a surprise. [One can read on in The Malay Mail Online here.]

The reported 200,000 rally may had an emotional impact on the French. They strongly uphold to such rights and freedom of speech, expression and thoughts even how improper and vulgar the message be [read here in MI].

Away from the emotional out pour in France, common sense still prevail. MCA and Dato Ti Lian Ker must have gone bonkers for trying to nitpick issue out of Ibrahim's statement to call for his arrest.

Generally most people, even Dato Ibrahim Ali, do not condone such violence, but one can hear the idiom "You reap what you sow" widely quoted.

As a friend said in our Alumni Whats App and it is worth to be shared:   
I am NOT Charlie,
I respect all religions,
I don't offend other religions,
I don't insult others on purpose.
Those who supported Eric Paulsen's series of insulting comments on Islam - the religion, it's ritual, institutions and status -  must be truly bonkers and sowing seeds of hatred.


That is Extremism.

His motivation and intention is obviously to anger the non Muslims and riled up the Christian voters for the upcoming Sarawak state election against Barisan Nasional.

That is not far from the insidious intention behind the Charles Hebdo killing.

Sceptic

This article came into one of the Whats App group, and was traced to the blog The Vineyard of The Saker. Reproduced below:


I am NOT Charlie

By The Saker

Thursday, January 08, 2015

Okay, let's be clear. I am not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don't even support the death penalty.  I loathe Takfirism.  I oppose violence as a means to make a political or ethical point.  I fully support freedom of speech, including critical speech and humor.

But this morning I am most definitely NOT Charlie.

In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the sick display of collective hypocrisy about the murders in France.  Here is why:

Charlie Hebdo for the Darwin Awards?

The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming. Here is what I wrote about them in September 2012 when they published their famous caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed: Worthy of the Darwin Awards, if you ask me.  Excellent, the “gene pool” of the French “caviar-Left” badly needs some cleaning". Today I fully stand by my words.

Just a stupid dare?
Let me ask you this: what would be the point of, say, taking a nap on train tracks? You don't have to "agree" with the train which will run you over, but it still will, won't it? What about taking a nap on train tracks specifically to make a point? To prove that the train is bad? To dare it? To make fun of it? Would that not be the height of stupidity?  And yet, that is *exactly* what Charlie Hebdo did. I would even argue that this is how Charlie Hebdo made it's money, daring the "Muslim train" to run them over. You think I am exaggerating? Check out the caricature which one of the folks who got murdered yesterday had just posted. The text reads: "Still no terrorist attacks in France - Wait, we have until the end of January to send you our best wishes". The crazy person shown in the drawing is packing a Kalashnikov and wearing an Afghan "Pakol" - the typical "crazy Muslim" in Charlie Hebdo's world.  Talk about a stupid dare...

"Spitting in people's souls"

There is an expression in Russian: spitting in somebody's soul. It fully applies here. Muslims worldwide have been unambiguously clear about that. They take blasphemy very, very seriously, as they do the name of the Prophet and the Quran. If you want to really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet or his Holy Book.  That is not a secret at all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their caricatures of the Prophet and when they ridiculed him the a deliberately rude and provocative manner, they knew what they were doing: they were very deliberately deeply offending 1.6 billion Muslims world wide.  Oh, and did I mention that in Islam blasphemy is a crime punishable by death? Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion Muslims exactly three decided to take justice in their own hands and kill the very deliberately blaspheming Frenchmen.    You don't have to be Muslim or to approve of the death penalty for blasphemy to realize that this was inevitable and that this has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. Offend any group as large as 1.6 billion and sooner or later you will find 1-5 folks willing to use violence to make you pay for it. This is a statistical inevitability.

Are some victims more equal then others?

So 12 deliberately "soul spitting blasphemers" were murdered and all of France is in deep mourning. The media worldwide does such a good job presenting it all as a planetary disaster that many thousands people worldwide say "I am Charlie", sob, light candles and take a "courageous" stance for freedom of speech.

Crocodile tears if you ask me.

The Emperor's freedom fighter
The fact is that the Anglo Zionists have carefully and lovingly nurtured, organized, armed, financed, trained, equipped and even directed the Takfiri crazies for decades.  From the war in Afghanistan to Syria today these murderous psychopaths have been the foot-soldiers of the AngloZionist Empire for decades.  But, apparently, nobody cares about their victims in Afghanistan, in Bosnia, in Chechnia, in Kosovo, in Libya. in Kurdistan, in Iraq or elsewhere.  There these liver-eating murderers are "freedom fighters" who get full support.  Including from the very same media which today is in mourning over Charlie Hebdo.  Apparently, in the western ethos some victims are more equal then others.

And when is the last time somebody in Europe shed a single tear over the daily murders of innocent people in the Donbass whose murder is paid for and directly directed by the western regimes?

How stupid do they think we are?

And then this.  Even a drooling idiot knew that Charlie Hebdo was THE prime target for that kind of attack.  And I promise you that French cops are not drooling idiots.  Yet, for some reason, they were nowhere to be seen that day.  Only a van with two (or one?) cop was parked nearby (hardly an anti-terrorist protection detail) and one poor cop was shot and then executed with an AK shot to the head while he was begging for mercy.  Is this the best the French state can do?
 
Hardly.
 
So what is going on here?  I will tell you what - the EU 1%ers are now capitalizing on these murders to crack down on their own population.  Sarkozy already met Hollande and they both agreed that new levels of firmness and vigilance need to be implemented.  Does that not reek of a French 9/11?
 
So no, I am most definitely NOT Charlie this morning and I am disgusted beyond words with the obscene display of doubleplusgoodthinking "solidarity" for a group of "caviar-lefties" who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it.  And I am under no illusion whatsoever about the fact that cui bono clearly indicates that the French regime either organized it all, or let it happen or, at the very least, makes maximal political use of it all.
 
But most of all, I am disgusted with all those who play along and studiously avoid asking the right questions about all this.  I guess they really are "Charlies" all of them.
 
I am not.

The Saker
False Flag

Anyone can see the current world agenda of the Zionist is to attack Islam by creating hatred and  doing all these but yet point their fingers to Muslims as Terrorist.

The killing of Charles Hebdo could be another 911 to justify another full scale military operations and this times the target is suspected to be Syria's so-called ISIS threat.

True, enough one former White House official, Paul Craig Roberts claimed the CIA is behind the killings of Charles Hebdo and 12 other. Telesur reported:
News > World   

Armed French intervention police are seen at the scene of a shooting in the street of Montrouge near Paris January 8, 2015.

CIA Behind France Attacks, Says Ex White House Official

Published 11 January 2015

Paul Craig Roberts, wrote on his blog Thursday that the atrocities were a "false flag" operation, similar to those carried out after WW II to frame communists.

Attacks carried out by alleged Islamic gunmen in France last week that left 17 dead were the work of the CIA, “designed to shore up France’s vassal status to Washington,” a former White House official has claimed.

Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and editor of the Wall Street Journal, Paul Craig Roberts, wrote on his blog Thursday that the atrocities were a “false flag” operation, similar to those carried out after World War II to frame communists.

“Muslims are going to be framed for an inside job designed to pull France firmly back under Washington’s thumb,” he wrote.

The tragedy began when two heavily armed brothers burst into the Paris office of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo Wednesday, killing 12. The drama continued with the murder of a policewoman, and two concurrent sieges, one in a kosher supermarket.

As evidence for his theory, Roberts drew on the revelation that the ID of gunman Said Kouachi was found on the scene, comparing it to the “undamaged passport of one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers (found) among the massive pulverized ruins of the twin towers,” another attack he claims the U.S. intelligence agency was behind.

Read more: France Hit by Charlie Hebdo Tragedy

The ex-Washington insider suggested that the motive could be to create greater dependence on the U.S. from France, whose president this week called for an end to Washington-imposed sanctions against Russia.

“This is too much foreign policy independence on France’s part for Washington,” Roberts wrote.

The publication of this version of events comes as Wikileaks posted a text Saturday that appears to be written by its founder, Julian Assange, which says the failure of the French authorities in the Charlie Hebdo massacre is so conspicuous, that questions about government links to the killers must be asked.

Among the author’s questions are: Why weren’t the  Kouachi brothers, both known to have extremist ties, not under surveillance?; Why were the Charlie Hebdo offices not better protected, given that the magazine regularly and strongly criticizes Islam?; and just how did two known terrorists get hold of semi-automatic weapons?

“Cherif Kouachi had already been convicted of terrorism offences and served 18 months in prison for it. Both brothers were already on terrorism lists. Far from hiding messages under rocks or using encryption, the alleged conspirators communicated hundreds of times before and during the attacks — on regular phones,” the article states..
Global Research suspected also of a False Flag Operation. Read Paris Killings: Media Lies, Unanswered Questions. Was it a False Flag?

Caution

Meanwhile, another article reached our Whats App, which cannot be traced to any news organisation, gave a Malaysian perspective.
Paris attack false flag ops
Malaysia, France and Norway seemingly experienced terror attacks after irking Israel, suggested Live Leak.

Malaysian planes started falling out of the sky after the Kuala Lumpur Tribunal found Israel guilty of genocide in late 2013, it said, referring to MH370 that went missing in March last year, and MH17 that was shot down in Ukraine in July.

"Just one month ago, France set off a stampede when its lower house voted to recognize Palestine.

"Suddenly "Islamic terror strikes France." Is Paris being punished for its pro-Palestine vote?" it asked in an article posted on its website.

Live Leak posted this following the Jan 7 shooting incident at the Charlie Hebdo satirical magazine office in France that allegedly killed 12 people.

Within two days French police eventually gunned down two suspects namely  Said and his brother Cherif Kouachi.

Live Leak also noted that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had warned that France was making a grave mistake by recognising Palestine as a state.

In 2011, the youth wing of Norway's Labor Party wanted to impose a complete blockade on Israel. Suddenly the entire leadership of the Party's youth wing was slaughtered in a professional operation falsely attributed to a lone nut, Anders Breivik, reported Live Leak.

Critics are claiming that the Paris terror attack was another false flag operation.

Veterans Today senior editor Gordon Duff noted that there appeared to be no blood after a gunman allegedly shot French policeman Ahmed Merabet using an AK-47 assault rifle.

"Bullets of AK-47 have steel rods in them used to penetrate body armor. These rods take out baseball sized chunks out of concrete. None of this was seen! ," said Duff.

The death of French police commissioner Helric Fredow who was investigating the Charlie Hebdo shooting incident had also raised suspicion.
 
Fredow, 45, a regional deputy director, had purportedly committed suicide on Thursday night shortly after meeting the family of one of the Charlie Hebdo massacre victims. He purportedly died before completing the report.

Meanwhile Charlie Hebdo is planning to increase its print from 60,000 copies previously to one million.

Most of the cartoonists killed were old timers namely Jean "Cabu" Cabut, 76, Bernard "Tignous" Verlhac, 57, Georges Wolinski, 80, and Philippe Honore, 73.

The magazine's editor-in-chief Gerard Biard  was in London during the incident, while many other journalists reportedly escaped death because they came in late.
For any Malaysian leader to express words of caution, be mindful that there are Malaysians that had involved themselves in ISIS war in Syria. That could be made as an excuse for them to interfere in the affair of Malaysia.

The intention of Malaysia to put anti-terror law with the presentation at PWTC using fake videos looked suspicious and wary. It seems we fell into the insidious American hands.

Otherwise, why would a G-to-G letter on information sharing was produced in court? The Minister may have made a mistake for entertaining the lawyer's request and is now in hot soup, but has anyone wonder why FBI behaved unprofessionally.

Intentional or a trap?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

good argument! good food for thought! Sordid world! dirty tactics! innocent lives have to pay ! Liberte! Fraternite ! and.... shit!!!!

IT.Scheiss said...

Youmight also find this position by a US-based Catholic group similar to Saker's position above.
=================================
=====================================================
Charlie Hebdo journalists 'provoked' their own slaughter with
'disgusting record', says American Catholic group

An American group that claims to represent the interests of US Catholics
has criticised the French magazine where 12 people were killed
yesterday, arguing that the victims “provoked” their own slaughter.

In a statement released yesterday headlined “Muslims are right to be
angry”, Bill Donohue, the president of the Catholic League for Religious
and Civil Rights, accused Charlie Hebdo of “intolerance” and its
journalists' “disgusting record” of playing a role in causing their own
death.

“Killing in response to insult, no matter how gross, must be
unequivocally condemned. That is why what happened in Paris cannot be
tolerated. But neither should we tolerate the kind of intolerance that
provoked this violent reaction,” he said in a statement.

“Those who work at this newspaper have a long and disgusting record of
going way beyond the mere lampooning of public figures, and this is
especially true of their depictions of religious figures.”

The Catholic League president described the newspaper’s publisher, who
was killed in the violence, as “narcissistic”, criticising him by name.

“Stephane Charbonnier, the paper’s publisher, was killed today in the
slaughter. It is too bad that he didn’t understand the role he played in
his tragic death.

“Had he not been so narcissistic, he may still be alive,” he said.

Mr Donohue cited cartoons of nuns masturbating and popes wearing
condoms, as well as depictions of the prophet Mohammed in “pornographic
poses”.

The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights is an influential
group in the United States, with a multi-million dollar budget and
assets, as well as membership numbering in the hundreds of thousands.

The League is the US’s largest Catholic civil rights organization and
was founded in 1973.

It is not directly associated with the Catholic Church's hierarchy but
has close ties to its local leadership in New York, according to US
newspaper The New York Times.

The tone of the comments by the League is in stark contrast to those of
the Catholic Church’s international leadership.

A spokesperson for Pope Francis yesterday condemned the slaughter at the
satirical magazine as “abominable” and called for unity.

“The Holy Father expresses his firmest condemnation of the horrible
attack," the spokesperson said.

“Whatever its motivation might be, homicidal violence is abominable
[and] is never justified.”

The murder of nine journalists, two police officers and a maintenance
man by masked men has shocked France. Around 11.30am yesterday gunmen
forcibly entered the offices of the satirical magazine, where a weekly
editorial meeting was taking place.

After forcing journalists to identify themselves, the gunmen opened
fire. They were later seen fleeing the building and are still at large.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/charlie-hebdo-journalists-provoked-their-own-slaughter-with-disgusting-record-says-american-catholic-group-9965225.html

Illuminati watcher said...

French president implies illumnati behind paris attack:

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/01/french-president-says-on-national-tv-that-the-illuminati-is-attacking-paris-3090632.html

Illuminati watcher said...

Paris attack false flag?: where r the massacred bodies? Why the dead are mostly elderly cartoonist? why no focus on funeral? Why the police chief investigating the incident suddenly 'commit suicide'? Why the head of the 'police officer' shot on the street did not shatter wen shot at such close range using AK47? There was no blood on pavement. A fake sky news reporter blurted out saying blood was later put there on the pavement where the police officer was allegedly shot.

My Say