RCI on Corporate Mafia: A Cure, or a Convenient Distraction?

In Malaysia, few phrases carry as much political drama as Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI). 

Invoke it, and the message is clear: something is deeply wrong, and only the highest level of scrutiny will do. Yet, as history shows, the call for an RCI is not always about justice—it is sometimes about optics, timing, and political advantage.

Today, calls for an RCI into an alleged Corporate Mafia echo loudly across segments of the political and civil society landscape. Among those advocating such a move are groups and figures like Democratic Action Party (DAP), Rafizi Ramli, Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism, and Lawyers for Liberty. 

Their argument is familiar that public confidence is low, institutions may be compromised, and only an independent commission can uncover the truth. It is a compelling narrative—but is it the right tool for the job?

Changing Nature of Employment: Government’s role for the next generation

In recent weeks, global developments have reminded us how interconnected the world economy has become. Rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have raised concerns about higher oil prices, inflation and the stability of financial markets. 

In Malaysia, political discussion has also shifted somewhat. Instead of the usual debates centred on race and religion, public conversations have increasingly focused on economic issues such as the rising cost of living, investment and economic reforms. 

In this environment, it is timely to reflect on another important issue affecting society: the changing nature of employment.

Naimah Daim: “Smoke, Dry Ice, or Fire?”

When individuals facing asset forfeiture and potential legal exposure hire sophisticated international communications teams, coordinate media timing, and engage multiple institutional channels, it is reasonable to ask whether the objective is merely reputation defence — or whether it is to raise the political cost of continuing the investigation.

The public reaction to allegations linking Naimah Daim to a supposed effort to destabilise the government has been swift: disbelief, dismissal, and déjà vu. Many instinctively framed it as another recycled political script, evoking the early defensive chorus during the 1MDB scandal — when critics were accused of plotting regime change rather than exposing financial misconduct.

But déjà vu can be intellectually dangerous. It tempts us to conclude before examining.