Azam Baki, Velocity Capital and the Politics of Selective Outrage

The Bloomberg report alleging that Tan Sri Azam Baki owned 17.7 million shares in Velocity Capital Berhad has predictably ignited a media and political storm. Within hours, the narrative hardened: the MACC Chief Commissioner had breached a 1993 civil service circular, and therefore his integrity was in question.

But when the noise settles, a more uncomfortable question emerges: are we dealing with a clear governance breach, or another episode of selective outrage shaped by politics, timing, and institutional backlash?

Modi’s Visit to Malaysia: Strategic Stakes Beyond Local Noise

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s official visit to Malaysia should be understood as a strategic milestone rather than filtered through the prism of episodic domestic controversies. 

In a rapidly fragmenting global order, where middle powers must navigate between economic uncertainty, geopolitical rivalry, and regional security pressures, the Malaysia–India relationship has regained strategic relevance that extends well beyond day-to-day political noise.

This visit also marks a deliberate reset following a period when bilateral relations lost momentum. During Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s second premiership, ties between Kuala Lumpur and New Delhi became strained. Indian media narratives largely attributed this to Mahathir’s public criticism of India’s position on Kashmir. 

Within Malaysian corporate and diplomatic circles, however, there was a quieter interpretation—that the chill reflected accumulated elite grievances, including dissatisfaction over how the late Ananda Krishnan’s business interests were treated in India. 

Since Hannah Yeoh coward from Segambut JMB controversy, can she restructure DBKL?

Elected Mayor for Kuala Lumpur: Democracy, Power, and the Limits of Good Intentions

Few governance ideas sound as intuitively appealing as the call for an elected mayor for Kuala Lumpur. It promises democracy, accountability, transparency, and a clear line of responsibility. In a city as complex, wealthy, and influential as Kuala Lumpur, the absence of an elected city leader feels, to many, like an anachronism.

Yet good intentions are not the same as good outcomes. Before embracing the idea wholesale, it is worth examining both the promise and the pitfalls—and more importantly, whether the political actors championing this reform are equipped to deliver the deep structural changes it would require.

Political intrigue of the Sunway-IJM merger proposal

Dive into “Is There More Than Meets the Eye?” — a deep look at the IJM–Sunway deal that challenges surface assumptions and raises tough questions about market logic and hidden dynamics in Corporate Malaysia. 

While we unpack these layers, curiosity peaks as Normala Dealova’s recent Facebook buzz questions why Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is seen out within just 22 days of hospitalisation, stirring fresh public intrigue around his recovery.

In the latest Edge Weekly publication, Jose Barrock claimed other bidders have surfaced to disrupt the chance meeting of Krishnan Tan and Jeffrey Cheah many years ago at "S" shopping complex.

So much intrigue ...

Majlis Raja-Raja should declare "Surat Kuning" invalid

The strong statement against corruption expressed by Agong during the opening of the latest Parliament session and other statements by fellow brother Sultans indicate the royal institution are seriously concern about corruption.

Agong's concern is in-sync with big corruption story involving top millitary brass that is hogging the news from the expose by opposition activist Chegubard. And Agong expressed pride the millitary clean-up is happening during his reign.

In his reaction to Agong's speech, Chegubard suggested the royalty show commitment against corruption by declaring "Surat Kuning" should be entertain. 

Its an open secret that Surat Kuning is still rampantly practised. Perhaps Majlis Raja-Raja Melayu could declare all Surat Kuning as invalid 

Petronas vs Petros: When “All Is Well” Masks a Deepening Federal–State Contest

Publicly, both Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Sarawak Premier Abang Johari Openg have been at pains to project stability and cooperation in relations between Petronas and Petroleum Sarawak Berhad (Petros). 

The official line has been consistent. Discussions are ongoing, misunderstandings will be resolved, and there is no crisis in federal–state relations. Within the oil and gas industry, however, the picture has been far less reassuring.

Industry insiders speak of tense, sometimes acrimonious meetings, strong words exchanged behind closed doors, and operational frictions that contradict the calm public narrative. Allegations have circulated — unverified but persistent — that Petronas operations in Sarawak, including facilities in Bintulu, have faced disruptions, and that work permits for Petronas personnel have been delayed or withheld. 

Whether fully accurate or not, these accounts underscore a reality that the dispute is no longer merely theoretical or political; it has begun to affect operational confidence.

Not time yet for chest thumping

Light at the End of the Tunnel — But No Victory Lap for Madani Yet

For the first time in years, Malaysia feels investable again. 

The ringgit has strengthened, foreign capital is returning—albeit cautiously—Bursa Malaysia has clawed its way past 1,700 points, and macroeconomic panic has given way to guarded optimism. 

After the political chaos of 2018–2022 and the economic trauma of Covid-19, this alone is no small achievement.

Yet it would be premature—perhaps even dangerous—for the Madani government to engage in chest-pounding. Markets may be calmer, but they are not yet convinced. 

What we are witnessing is not a ringing endorsement of Anwar Ibrahim’s reform agenda, but a conditional reprieve: confidence in stability, not yet belief in transformation.

There is light at the end of the tunnel. But the tunnel is long, narrow, and politically treacherous.